|
Urban poor fights ban on
contraception
Coming
from Manila’s depressed areas, twenty Manileños
have asked the Court of Appeals to repeal Executive
Order 003 which bans the distribution of contraceptives
in Manila City health centers. The petitioners claim
that EO 003 has deprived them of resources to practice
family planning and responsible parenthood after their
regular supplies of condoms and pills were cut off.
The
EO 003 was imposed in February 2000 by former Manila
Mayor Lito Atienza, who claims to be a devout Christian.
The new mayor, Alfredo Lim, however, is said to be
reluctant to lift the ban on artificial contraceptives
in Metro Manila’s most populated city. This
is why the petitioners chose to go to court instead
to, once and for all, determine whether the EO has
violated the constitutional right to protect families
and respect individual religious practices.
Why
ban condom ads?
Some
groups namely AIDS FREE-Philippines, Human Life International,
and Family Media Advocacy Foundation are calling for
the ban of advertisements promoting the use of condoms.
Why?
Because, according to them, the ads are “offensive
to public morals.” What?!
First,
define public morals. Second, who has set the standards
for offensiveness? And lastly, define responsibility?
Instead
of backing the petition with vague rhetoric, how about
considering the following:
• According to the National Statistics Office,
the actual total fertility rate of 3.2 is higher than
the desired fertility rate of 2.5.
• One in six women do not practice family planning
due to lack of resources or lack of information.
• Condom use has been proven to be the best
defense in preventing the transmission of sexually
transmitted infections, including HIV-AIDS.
• The ban on distribution of contraceptives
has mostly affected those with no resources to buy
contraceptives or those who have no access to information
regarding family planning. |